How I feel about each carrier’s respective Galaxy S II variant

The US versions of the Samsung Galaxy S II for Sprint, AT&T, and T-Mobile

It’s been a long wait…seriously, like months overdue. I was VERY excited about the Galaxy S II at the time when the European version came out. I hoped and hoped for the US variants to land some time during this past summer, but they never came. Today was the day though…the long wait finally came to an end as Samsung announced the Galaxy S II for AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint. So, the core hardware and software experience on each variant is pretty much the same as that of the international version, but there are a few minor differences between the variants. Here’s how I feel about each carrier’s respective Galaxy S II:

AT&T – simply called the Samsung Galaxy S II

AT&T's Galaxy S II

The original Galaxy S II had a pretty nice design. It had a nice sized display and a pretty polished and clean looking backside. AT&T’s version resembles the international version more than the other carriers’ versions. Some important things to point out is that the display on AT&T’s version is also 4.3-inches (diagonally). If the Sprint and T-Mobile versions didn’t come with 4.5-inch screens, I probably wouldn’t have bagged on this, but I feel they should have just given the AT&T version a 4.5-inch screen too. Just my opinion, I’m sure there are people out there who’d rather have the smaller screen/phone, but I for one think the extra .2 inches is going to turn more heads in public and gaming and web browsing will just be better. Also, the AT&T variant has a smaller battery compared to those found in Sprint’s and T-Mobile’s. It seems like they decided to upgrade more specs in the other two carriers’ respective versions. Poor AT&T.

 

T-Mobile – like AT&T’s, it’ll just be called the Samsung Galaxy S II

T-Mobile's Galaxy S II

In case you haven’t read about the Samsung event on tech news sites yet, bloggers weren’t able to get their hands on the T-Mobile variant at the event because it was boxed up in a display case. I don’t know why, but it was. Perhaps certain aspects were not finalized and they didn’t want to show off buggy software. I personally think it has to do with the apps on there not running well yet, but whatever. I like that the T-Mobile version has a bigger screen than AT&T’s and most likely a bigger battery (they couldn’t confirm this since it was boxed up, but I’m pretty sure it’s a bigger battery than AT&T’s and the same as Sprint’s). In regards to design, all they were able to say was that the phone was the curviest of the 3. That’s probably gonna be a good thing because with such a big screen, it’d be a little less ergonomic if the device was more squared off and boxy. None of the pictures I’ve seen on any of the blogs were able to show off the T-Mobile variant’s backside, but I’m sure hoping it looks like those leaked Hercules pictures from before where it had what looked like a black, brushed aluminum back plate. This thing is supposed to be able to utilize T-Mobile’s 42 Mbps HSPA+, so it’s a shame that they weren’t able to showcase that.

 

Sprint – Samsung Epic 4G Touch (I think this name is stupid by the way)

Sprint's Epic 4G Touch

So Sprint’s version has one neat little feature that I’m sure many of us like, and that’s the little LED notification light at the top right corner. It’s not that big of a deal, but it’s certainly nice to have. As for the phone’s design, I like that it’s more rounded thans AT&T’s. It doesn’t seem to be as curvy as T-Mobile’s though. I particular am not too excited about the oval design of the camera pod. I like the square pods from the European and AT&T versions better. This baby will support Sprint’s 4G WiMax, which I don’t think is as fast as T-Mobile’s 42 Mbps HSPA+, but I guess that’ll vary depending on location…then again, it doesn’t matter for me, because I’m sure T-Mobile’s speeds are better in my location than Sprint’s, and T-Mobile’s my carrier so, hmph!

So, to round this all up, I’m feeling kinda just…blah. This whole thing was big news a few months going heading into summer, but now, it just feels a little too late. In a few short weeks, we’ll probably hear some news about the next Nexus device and version of Android, 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich). The Nexus Prime is rumored to have some amazing specs (such as the next generation of Samsung’s Super AMOLED display), along with Ice Cream Sandwich. Those two features alone are enough for me to hold out on the Galaxy S II until I hear more about Google’s next big thing. If you want more info on the¬†unveiling event of the Galaxy S II, hit the links below for some reports by some big tech news sites:

Engadget - Some video footage from Engadget HERE
PhoneDog
Android and Me

About these ads
Tagged , , , , , , , ,

5 thoughts on “How I feel about each carrier’s respective Galaxy S II variant

  1. Chris says:

    I actually like the AT&T version the best. I held the infuse the other day and while the screen is nice. The phone is huge and no major benefit over the 4.3″ screen. Also I think its still a big deal phone. Its the smoothest moving android phone we have ever seen. Ice cream sandwich or not its running a very nice version of android. Can’t keep looking for the next update. You’ll never be happy with what you got

    • Alex Nguyen says:

      I’m not the type that continually waits for the next big thing, but the point I was trying to make is that Ice Cream Sandwich and the Nexus will be announced soon, and since we’re so close, there’s no harm in waiting it out a few more weeks before biting the bullet. Plus, if you get the latest up to date technology, which the Ice Cream Sandwich will be, you don’t have to worry about it being out of date for a while. Gingerbread on the other hand is almost a year old.

  2. I agree, they took way to long to release the device in the US. It is a great phone, no doubt, but you might as well wait for the Nexus Prime (unless you have a motorola cliq). Also, I’m on T-Mobile and I hate the way that version looks! It’s fun having the latest specs, but if the phone looks ugly I can’t be happy. I tried settling before with a Mytouch 4g. At the time it was the best, but I eventually came to hate the phone because of the way it looked. I want a nice design like the HTC Sensation I have now…. it is beautiful! The rounded edges on the Galaxy make it look horrible (in my opinion) and remind me of the MyTouch 4g. I’m also not a fan of touchwiz. Regardless, I wouldn’t complain if I had this phone, but I’ll wait to see what the Prime has in store for me.

    • Alex Nguyen says:

      I think seeing how T-Mobile’s version looks from the back might help its overall image. Do you not like TouchWiz because of the way it looks? Because in terms of features, functionality, and speed, it actually has a lot of cool things to offer. It runs a lot smoother than Sense 3.0 too, which I might add, looks gorgeous, but they need to iron it out a little bit in terms of fluidity. With all the fancy animations, Sense 3.0 devices see lag time to time in simple tasks such as scrolling through homescreens. Sense 3.0 definitely looks better than TouchWiz that’s for sure.

  3. Larry says:

    Hello-

    What else is the AT&T Version missing? I also noticed the AT&T S-2 is listing UMTS? yet their claiming 4G*. Its very confusing, does the UMTS mean its really a 3G phone?

    AT&T has demonstrated a gift to ruin nice phones, I hope this one is not on their ruin menu-

    Lastly, do you have any idea as to when the release date is?

    Thank you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: